Poker After Dark Season 6 Episode 7 2/4 Top Guns Cash Game #2 PAD S06E07
April 1, 2010 by admin
Filed under poker table top
$150 Poker Bankroll for FREE – NO DEPOSIT!
http://www.pokerstrategy.com/uG509V
Additional $600 4 FREE!! [No deposit | No Quiz]: http://www.yourpokercash.com/addby/USD4FREE
“Top Guns Cash Game #2″ Top Guns Cash Game #2 PAD Poker After Dark the cash game PAD S06 S7 Se.07 Se07 se7 se7 season ep7 ep07 ep.07 ep.7 Tom Dwan Patrik Antonius Howard Lederer Eli Elezra Ilari Sahamies Phil Ivey durrrr Poker After Dark S06E05 Top Guns Cash Game #1 season 6 episode 1 HQ HD FULL Cash Game Format – $200/$400 blinds with $100 ante – Buy-ins range from 100k to 250k Poker After Dark Season 7 – Episode 7 Table 1 – Part 2 PAD 2009 2010 the cash game
Duration : 0:10:34
[youtube iQqz3NtUA2Q]
Sahamies got a lot …
Sahamies got a lot of heart!
there all sh it
there all sh it
@cardmastad Never …
@cardmastad Never disrespect Norman Chad. You should eat a dick.
Norman Chad better? …
Norman Chad better? You cannot be serious. In fact, you must be queer.
Ali is a great commentator that knows the games finer points and comments on poker + the players thought process’s.
Chad is just a clown and yaps about stupidity that appeals to the mass idiots that don’t know about the real game of poker.
they should change …
they should change the name of the show to Prop betting after dark
yes, she’s …
yes, she’s disgusting, who in their right mine would fine her attractive (insert sarcasm)
Am i the only one …
Am i the only one that thinks the hostess is hot as ? did you know that she has taken naked photoshoots?
nah norman chad is …
nah norman chad is much better than this guy, i already know what the action is he doesnt need to announce it, say something interesting for sake
i totally agree. …
i totally agree. nejad is passive and states the action. thats all you need from an announcer. alot better than norman chad making terrible jokes at 1 million decibles
but variance is …
but variance is crazy when it’s 50 – 50 or 33 -33 -33. so one of them can win biig money
it’s after dark. …
it’s after dark. they don’t want an announcer speculating on everything. nejad talks very little. just enough. he keeps it mellow. that way people can fall asleep peacefully
God this show has …
God this show has some great poker, but they really need to get a new announcer. Even if they just added an another guy it would be better. The announcer they have now doesn’t add anything to the show. I want to listen to someone who knows what they are talking about. Somebody who can start up a good conversation about what is happening in the game. What were they thinking when they hired this guy?
Yah.. what a table …
Yah.. what a table when Lederer is the fish.
I only think they …
I only think they play the 50k per flop if they agree to it or both are in the hand to see it. I don’t think ivey and sahamies are doing it every flop, but then again im not there to beable to know and the annoying announcer doesn’t explain it enough.
Wish Gabe or some other poker players would do the commentary. Even Norm is more entertaining then this guy.
Bad play by …
Bad play by Ziigmund.
CP3, I am sure Phil knew at the turn already that Ziigmund was chasing something with low cards. K is unlikely to have helped him, as he checked the flop and he’d raise the flop with face cards. And seeing Phil’s TT would also beat any low pocket pair, it’s easy for him to call.
Also he didn’t have the odds to chase that straight draw to begin with, he just wasted a lot of money.
A huge bet at the end is usually a bluff, someone with the nuts would value bet.
Sahamies seem to be …
Sahamies seem to be forgetting his poker face ( pitfall of onliner ! ). His 51k bet at the river was so easy to read – bluff especially when reader is Ivey …
.. Sahamies is somewhat pig headed with betting, not seeing how Ivey already raised after flop and at the turn .. slowly milking the cash cow.
sahaiems made a …
sahaiems made a good effort on the river. he was chasing,missed his card, but looked like he hit it on the river..
Oh ok, I get it. …
Oh ok, I get it. Thanks.
that’s right, they …
that’s right, they are playing roulette without the zero
Thanks for the …
Thanks for the reply OmnicideX, but I still don’t get it. *Every single flop* will have either at least two red cards, or at least two black cards. There must be more to it, or I am not getting something.
Lederer getting …
Lederer getting worked
2 or more red cards …
2 or more red cards on the flop – Ivey wins 50K;
2 or more black cards on the flop – Sahamies wins 50K.
Thats why Ivey raise (in hope that everybody else will fold)with any 2 red cards cuz theres less chance reds will come on the flop.
ivey is a beast, …
ivey is a beast, everyone else on that table except maybe durrrr would have folded those two pair considering the way ziggy played the hand. great play
Can someone please …
Can someone please explain the red vs black prop bet?
nice play by Phil …
nice play by Phil Ivey.